<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shared Memory In Linux</title>
	<link>http://www.codemaestro.com/reviews/11</link>
	<description>The Coding Experience</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.codemaestro.com/reviews/11#comment-10061</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codemaestro.com/reviews/11#comment-10061</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the info, I think this solves a problem for me. I create linked lists [that is chained structure] in a shared memory seg. First program loads the data [lots of it about 10 lists including processes to start into shm.  second process [an exec] reads the data in the shm, sets up coms to about 100 remote nodes, fires up processes local and remote , and supervises the "system". Only under linux the second process cannot see the linked list. The start of a list is a fixed offset from the start of shm but the  back and next pointers of the next "link" point to locations with junk. No data, no valid next.   I will try this shm file to see if it will get me out of a problem. I ran your test code and it looks good.  So again thanks for the info.  best regards, (dja.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, I think this solves a problem for me. I create linked lists [that is chained structure] in a shared memory seg. First program loads the data [lots of it about 10 lists including processes to start into shm.  second process [an exec] reads the data in the shm, sets up coms to about 100 remote nodes, fires up processes local and remote , and supervises the &#8220;system&#8221;. Only under linux the second process cannot see the linked list. The start of a list is a fixed offset from the start of shm but the  back and next pointers of the next &#8220;link&#8221; point to locations with junk. No data, no valid next.   I will try this shm file to see if it will get me out of a problem. I ran your test code and it looks good.  So again thanks for the info.  best regards, (dja.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.codemaestro.com/reviews/11#comment-2473</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.codemaestro.com/reviews/11#comment-2473</guid>
					<description>Do you have a source for the "heavy performance penalty"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a source for the &#8220;heavy performance penalty&#8221;?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
